B57

Pure Crypto. Nothing Else.

News

Atomic Wallet Requests Court Dismissal of Class Action Over $100 Million Hack

The Legal Tango: Atomic Wallet’s Dismissal Motion

In the ongoing saga that could have scripted a Hollywood thriller, the company behind Atomic Wallet has waltzed into a Colorado court, requesting that a class-action lawsuit related to a staggering $100 million hack be promptly dismissed. The firm, headquartered in Estonia, claims that the suit should have been staged in its homeland, where the story originally unfolded.

The U.S. Connection: Just One User in Colorado

Atomic Wallet insists that it has “no U.S. ties,” supporting its dismissal request by highlighting that only a solitary user in Colorado is allegedly impacted. This brings us to the age-old legal question: can one user make a class? Apparently, Atomic Wallet thinks not!

Terms of Service: Liability in Fine Print

Atomic makes a compelling argument by pointing to its end-user license agreement that serves a lawyer’s dream — or perhaps a nightmare. This agreement states that any litigation must occur in Estonia, and importantly, it also includes a cherry that disclaims liability for losses due to theft, capping damages at a mere $50 per user. Let’s just say, if you’re expecting to retire off those crypto gains, you might want to adjust your expectations.

Navigating Negligence Claims

When it comes to the allegations of negligence, Atomic Wallet firmly contends there was no legal duty to protect against hacking incidents. To further bolster its case, the firm referred to past court rulings in Colorado that have turned similar claims into proverbial pumpkins when the clock strikes midnight. “This Court has repeatedly rejected similar claims because Colorado recognizes no such duty,” the company posted like a lawyer’s version of mic-drop.

Fraudulent Misrepresentation: A No-Go Zone

In a double whammy, the allegations of fraudulent misrepresentation didn’t fare any better. The Estonian company dismissed these claims with the finesse of a seasoned dodgeball player. The plaintiffs had initiated this class action back in August, two months post-hack, blaming an audacious exploit on hackers linked to both North Korean and Ukrainian groups. The lesson here? In the world of crypto, clarity and strong legal footing are king.

The Bigger Picture: Security in the Crypto Space

This case raises larger issues of security in the crypto industry. As users, it’s vital to understand the terms and conditions of wallets and exchanges. They say an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. In this case, maybe reading the fine print would save a bit more than just $50!

LEAVE A RESPONSE

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *