B57

Pure Crypto. Nothing Else.

News

Binance Takes Legal Action Against Forbes, Unleashing Legal Heavyweight Charles Harder

Binance’s Lawsuit Overview

In a stunning legal move, Binance has filed a lawsuit against Forbes in the U.S. District Court of New Jersey, asserting that a particular article published by the news outlet was defamatory. In the lawsuit, Binance claims that the damages incurred amount to “millions of dollars,” and it has raised eyebrows across the legal landscape as the company steps up its battle against unfavorable media portrayal.

Enter Charles Harder

To spearhead this lawsuit, Binance has enlisted the services of Charles Harder, an attorney whose notable reputation evokes both admiration and anxiety. Harder is best known for his role in winning a massive $140 million judgment for Hulk Hogan against Gawker Media, a legal saga that not only changed lives but also brought down a whole media entity in 2016.

A Reputation for High-Stakes Litigation

Harder’s experience in high-friction cases makes him a formidable opponent. His recent legal battles include representing Donald Trump in a controversial legal skirmish with adult film star Stormy Daniels. In this case, Harder successfully achieved an anti-SLAPP motion that protected his client’s interests in the face of media scrutiny.

Defamation and Legal Tactics

The defamation lawsuit filed by Binance isn’t just a garden-variety legal spat; it reflects a broader trend of powerful entities using lawsuits as a tool to deter unfavorable coverage. The use of Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP) has been spotlighted in recent years, raising concerns about how they can potentially silence critics and burden them with exorbitant legal costs.

Harder’s Track Record

  • Gawker Media: Secured $115 million for Hulk Hogan.
  • Stormy Daniels: Won an anti-SLAPP motion for Trump.
  • Melania Trump: Achieved a $2.9 million settlement from the Daily Mail.

While Harder’s approach has led to significant victories, he hasn’t always emerged triumphant. His previous attempt to represent Harvey Weinstein against the New York Times fizzled out when he decided not to pursue the case.

The Bigger Picture

This lawsuit raises questions about the ethics of media reporting and the power dynamics at play in the world of big business and journalism. As Binance takes this serious step, it underscores how high-profile individuals and organizations are now ready to tussle in court when challenged by the press.

Conclusion

As Binance moves forward with its legal battle, eyes will be glued not just to the courtroom but also to the implications this case could have on journalistic independence and corporate accountability. In the grand chess game of public opinion and legal maneuvers, it seems Binance isn’t just a player—they’re all in.

LEAVE A RESPONSE

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *