Yang’s UBI Vision: A Fiat Fantasy?
In a recent Twitter exchange, U.S. presidential candidate Andrew Yang caused quite a stir when he proclaimed, “I’m literally trying to give everybody money.” Yet, in the beautifully chaotic world of cryptocurrency, Bitcoin proponents swiftly shot back, raising eyebrows (and some hackles) regarding the nature of Yang’s proposed financial relief.
The Great Distinction: Bitcoin vs. Fiat
Many Bitcoiners were quick to remind Yang that what he refers to as “giving away money” is in fact
- Fiat: Government-issued currency, subject to inflation and manipulation.
- Bitcoin: Decentralized, limited in supply, and resistant to arbitrary monetary policies.
Samson Mow, Blockstream’s chief strategy officer, perhaps summed it up best: “Please be specific that you’re giving away fiat, not money.” Such reminders mark a microcosm of the larger debate over what defines real currency in an age of digital innovation.
Bitcoin as Insurance Against Fiscal Folly
Travis Kling, chief investment officer at Ikigai Fund, chimed in with an eloquent breakdown:
“Bitcoin is a non-sovereign, hardcapped supply, global, immutable, decentralized, digital store of value. It is an insurance policy against monetary and fiscal policy irresponsibility from central banks and governments globally.”
Translation? Bitcoin isn’t just a trendy investment; it’s people’s financial safety net in a world where central banks can print money like it’s candy.
Unwanted Echoes of OneCoin
If Yang’s UBI plan felt reminiscent of certain past debacles in the crypto sphere, it wasn’t lost on commentators. The infamous OneCoin case came to mind as they analyzed Yang’s proposal to flood the market with a fiat-like currency. OneCoin was notorious for inflating its token supply to lure in followers—and eventually left a trail of fraud that conned investors out of a whopping $4 billion.
The Lessons We Shouldn’t Forget
What’s the takeaway? As the world grapples with an ever-growing debt crisis (heading towards an alarming $255 trillion), the notion of “making it rain” fiat leaves many feeling uneasy. After all, Yang’s idea of buoying citizens with currency, while sounding generous in theory, raises questions about monetary worth and stability.
Conclusion: Embracing Economic Reality
As the debate unfolds, one can’t help but wonder: can we truly solve our fiscal woes by simply printing more money? In the face of rising debt and financial instability, it’s vital for both citizens and policymakers to understand the critical differences between fiat currencies and the values upheld by decentralized options like Bitcoin. Go on, Andrew, what’s your next step? Investing in impractical ideas or are we ready to challenge the status quo?
+ There are no comments
Add yours