Legislative Rollercoaster for Crypto Users
The European Parliament is keeping crypto enthusiasts on their toes with the latest move to tighten regulations. Last week, a new set of demanding data disclosure requirements for digital asset service providers was dropped in a haste vote, reminiscent of a high-stakes poker game where the stakes keep rising without proper warning. Just days earlier, a breath was held as a proposal to ban proof-of-work-based cryptocurrencies narrowly dodged the bullet. The crypto community is left wondering where all the fun went, as cheerless legislation looms over them.
EU’s Stance on Anti-Money Laundering
Unlike the jubilant resolution surrounding the Markets in Crypto Assets framework, the new Anti-Money Laundering rules come packed with anti-crypto rhetoric into the next phase of negotiation, hilariously dubbed ‘trialogue.’ If passed, compliant exchanges might have to stop transactions from “unhosted” wallets—what a fancy way to say ‘self-custodied.’ The question hangs in the air: has ‘self-hosted’ suddenly morphed into a term reminiscent of an abandoned puppy?
Tax Time Troubles Across the Pond
Meanwhile, tax season is creeping in from the other side of the Atlantic, accompanied by the Biden administration’s ambitious proposal to chop close to $5 billion off the budget deficit. The strategy? Revamp reporting rules around digital asset taxes for the upcoming fiscal year. This might sound appealing to the government, but for crypto users, it’s like adding another layer to an already convoluted cake of confusion.
Politics vs. Monetary Policy
In monetary policy news, the White House seems to have achieved a nod of approval for its four Federal Reserve nominees. What was once seen as a simple formality is now increasingly caught up in partisan battles, showing that monetary policy is no longer just about numbers—it’s about who can yell the loudest at the family dinner table of American politics.
The Language of Regulation: A Dismal Disconnect
The crux of the matter lies in terminology. How did ‘self-hosted’ become a euphemism for ‘unhosted’? The term came about after the U.S. Treasury’s 2020 crackdown, aiming to impose strict financial monitoring on exchanges handling transactions linked to such wallets. Thanks to this delightful misnomer, a notion is crafted that having a wallet that isn’t hooked up to a centralized platform equates to some sort of financial negligence. It’s like saying owning a pet fish automatically makes you a bad ocean keeper!
EU Regulations: A Step Too Far?
Armed with this well-curated terminology, EU lawmakers have outdone themselves. If the FATF—the global monitor on financial action—suggested reporting only for significant transactions, EU rules fancy going big or going home. They demand reporting for all transactions, no matter how small. Not to mention, users will be required to identify the beneficial owner of their self-custodied wallets. Talk about putting compliance in a chokehold!
A Digital Dollar Without the Snooping
Shifting gears, Representative Stephen Lynch is throwing a lifeline with a proposal for a digital cash aiming for consumer protection and privacy. Interestingly, it is not positioned as a central bank concept, but rather a project for the Treasury, intensifying the discussions surrounding privacy and surveillance amid rising concerns about a central bank digital currency (CBDC). Caution seems to be the name of the game as Congress seeks to navigate these murky waters.
Battle Against the Fed’s Retail CBDC
On the topic of e-cash, U.S. Senator Ted Cruz is leading a fresh charge against the Federal Reserve’s ability to issue a retail-focused CBDC, coinciding perfectly with Representative Tom Emmer’s past legislation push. This makes one wonder if the next thrilling political game show will be titled, ‘Who Wants to Be a Digital Millionaire?’
Disappointment at the Bitcoin ETF Front
And as the spotlight shines bright, another Bitcoin ETF application meets a somewhat predictable end. The SEC took a hard pass on the ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF, citing the same age-old excuse about lacking a comprehensive surveillance-sharing agreement—classic! With Grayscale also poised to head to the legal arena if their bid is rejected, the tale of ETFs continues with all the suspense of a well-written drama.
The Countdown to Change
Mark your calendars! The deadline for the SEC’s decision on Grayscale’s product is set for July 7, leaving the market on the edge of their seats once again. Can the crypto world hold its collective breath until then? Who knew that waiting for government approvals could become the new national pastime!
+ There are no comments
Add yours