The Unhealthy Race: Bullard’s Take on Cryptocurrencies
In a world where Bitcoin and altcoins are trying to steal the spotlight from fiat, James Bullard, the St. Louis Fed Chief, has thrown down the gauntlet, calling cryptocurrencies part of a global currency competition that he finds, well, rather toxic. Speaking at the Central Bank Research Association 2019 annual meeting, Bullard laid out his points in a chat called “Public and Private Currency Competition”. Spoiler alert: it didn’t end with a standing ovation.
History Repeats Itself: Bullard’s Historical Lens
According to Bullard, global currency competition isn’t a new phenomenon; it’s more like going to a family reunion where you forgot why you’re all there in the first place. He pointed out that the electronic delivery of value is also nothing new. Historical references abound—like when 90% of American money in the 1830s was printed by private banknotes, leading to chaos akin to your uncle trying to barbecue, but he forgets the main dish.
Localized Non-Uniformity: A Recipe for Disaster
His main worry? The move toward a localized, non-uniform currency, which he believes is not just a passing phase. Evidence suggests this trend could lead to increased global volatility in exchange rates, making the economy as stable as a one-legged chair on a rocky path. Bullard argues that without a standard, we could find ourselves navigating a currency landscape riddled with varying pay rates, like a game of Monopoly where everyone decides to make their own rules.
Lessons from the Past: Cryptocurrencies & Historical Precedent
Stepping back into time, Bullard draws on historical examples to frame his ideas. He mentions Peter Temin’s book, The Jacksonian Economy, highlighting how the lack of uniformity caused endless problems, leading to the Civil War’s uniform pay rates. Apparently, the notion of getting paid in a currency determined by the nearest privately-owned bank wasn’t exactly popular. Who would want to barter for groceries with money that’s worth a different amount in each town?
AOC Weighs In: The Scrip Situation
Meanwhile, legislation and discussions on cryptocurrency regulation are heating up, with Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez questioning representatives from digital finance companies. She pulled out the big guns, highlighting the term ‘scrip’— a currency controlled by companies—and warned of the risk involved. It’s like if your paycheck came from *Uncle Bob’s Medieval Castle* instead of your government, but with more Wi-Fi and fewer jousts. She went so far as to mention the historical instability surrounding scrip, which had been banned under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.
The Bottom Line: What’s Next for Crypto?
So, where does that leave us? With Bullard raising alarms and AOC detouring us into history lessons, the future of cryptocurrencies in the face of traditional finance remains uncertain. The battle lines are drawn between public and private currencies, and as history shows, the outcome could change the way we manage money forever. With a side effect of making our financial system as wobbly as a toddler riding a tricycle, here’s hoping a solution surfaces soon before we all have to start bartering with avocados.
+ There are no comments
Add yours