HayCoin Gets a Fiery Farewell
On October 20, Hayden Adams, the mastermind behind Uniswap, made headlines by burning a whopping 99% of the HayCoin (HAY) supply. This bold move came amidst rising concerns over the token’s price speculation, with Adams stating, “The last week’s activity treating HAY like a memecoin has been quite puzzling.”
From a Simple Experiment to a Speculative Scandal
Initially deployed five years ago as a testing tool before Uniswap’s launch, the HayCoin was never meant to become the center of such commotion. Adams recalls, “Back in the day, it felt like gas prices were lower than a penny candy. I created a small liquidity pool with a tiny fraction of the total supply, and the rest just sat over 99.9% in my digital wallet.”
Not Your Regular Memecoin
Despite its origins, HayCoin surprisingly attracted attention like a cat video on a Sunday afternoon. Adams reflected on this sudden popularity:
“Was extremely surprised to see people buying and selling significant dollar amounts this past week, treating it like a memecoin. Crypto can be weird sometimes.”
An Eye-Watering Burn
With around $650 billion in HAY tokens incinerated, Adams labeled the recent speculation as “silly.” His main concern? Not wanting to showcase his profile picture alongside a meme currency that sparked rampant speculation. He quipped:
“Ultimately, I’m uncomfortable owning almost the entire supply (~99.99%) of a token that people are memeing and speculating on.”
The Inflationary Twist
Burning tokens is not just for dramatic flair; it permanently removes them from circulation, creating a rarefied supply which can deceptively influence the price. Just after the burn, HAY managed to trade at a mind-numbing $2,392,640, with an unprecedented 235% rise in just 24 hours, according to market trackers.
Tax Implications—The Unwanted Aftertaste
Intrigued Twitter users raised eyebrows with the potential tax implications of Adams’ decision. One user pointed out, “Assuming a cost basis of $0, a ~$650 billion disposal gives rise to ~$128 billion long-term capital gains liability.” Ouch, that’s one hefty tax bill! Some even controversially suggested that Adams could have cashed out and donated the profits instead, stirring a debate laced with humorous skepticism.
Conclusion
As HayCoin’s saga comes to a close, it serves as a reminder of the bizarre and sometimes wild world of cryptocurrency. Adams’ actions sparked both intrigue and discussion, proving once again that things can get hilariously complicated in the crypto realm.
+ There are no comments
Add yours