The Legal Showdown
A storm is brewing in the courtrooms as one legal team throws its hat in the ring against iFinex, the parent company of Tether and Bitfinex, amidst allegations of orchestrating illegal activities that fueled Bitcoin’s meteoric rise in 2017. According to a filing dated January 13 in the Southern District of New York, the counsel representing Eric Young, Adam Kurtz, and David Crystal seeks to take the coveted title of “Interim Lead Counsel” among various others filing similar grievances. Represented by the seasoned law firms Radice and Kirby McInerney, they’re not here to play nice; they’re channeling their inner courtroom gladiators.
What Does ‘Interim Lead Counsel’ Even Mean?
This newly minted title is akin to being crowned the grand marshal at a parade of class-action suits descending upon iFinex. Young’s team hopes to front this legal carnival, which also includes associated cases like Leibowitz et al. v. iFinex and Laubus et al. v. iFinex, that are tangling over claims of market manipulation. Should they succeed in gaining this recognition, they’ll represent a broad group of Bitcoin investors—those hearty souls who were potentially led down the path of financial despair by iFinex’s alleged antics.
Expertise in Numbers
The Young legal team isn’t just waving their hands around; they’re packing a hefty punch. They boast that their filing includes original expert analyses and statistical examinations not featured in the Leibowitz complaint. It’s like bringing a magician to a card game waiting to pull a rabbit out of a hat—except it’s just big data and fancy numbers that might win the day for their clients.
Who’s Driving This Legal Train?
Taking the lead as the captain of this ship is none other than Karen Lerner, a partner at Kirby McInerney. In a conversation with Cointelegraph, she laid it down straight: “Interim class counsel will be responsible for protecting the interests of the class at this stage.” This includes everything from representing the class in court motions to deciphering complex data during discovery, and eventually working toward that sweet, sweet goal of class certification.
The Jurisdictional Tango
In a curious twist, the case has danced its way out of Washington State, now firmly planted in New York. It seems Laubus decided to mimic much of Young’s language upon re-filing. Meanwhile, iFinex, not one to take these claims lying down, has labeled the allegations as “mercenary and baseless,” sounding more like a villain in a superhero movie than a corporate entity on trial.
The Inevitable Suspicions
As accusations and investigations continue, the whispers surrounding Tether’s possible role in manipulating the 2017 Bitcoin bull market don’t seem to be fading away. In fact, these suspicions were initially flared up back in June 2018. With every new twist in this saga, more questions arise. Did Tether calculate a master plan to skyrocket Bitcoin prices? Only the courtroom—and perhaps a few cryptographic secrets—hold the answers.
+ There are no comments
Add yours