The Clash of Code and Law
Imagine a world where your money is as digital as your cat videos, and yet it dances around legal frameworks like a toddler at a wedding. In Professor Matthias Lehmann’s article, Who Owns Bitcoin? Private (International) Law Facing the Blockchain, he reveals that permissionless networks like Bitcoin pose significant headaches for applying traditional private law. So, strap in folks; we’re taking a trip into the wild, wild west of legal challenges!
Two Legal Birds: Endogenous and Exogenous Problems
Professor Lehmann categorizes the legal issues arising from blockchain into two groups: endogenous and exogenous problems. Endogenous issues is a fancy way of saying the mess ups that happen on the blockchain itself; think faulty transfers or erroneous transactions. On the other hand, we have exogenous problems, which are like those unexpected guests showing up to a party—like opening insolvency proceedings. Why does this matter? Because, under the current blockchain dynamics, there’s no way to undo transactions or transfer titles beyond the blockchain. Talk about a bad day!
The Bizarre Nature of Blockchain
Blockchain is unique, kind of like that quirky uncle you only see during family reunions. It’s both irreversible and anational. Lehmann argues that pinpointing which legal system applies to a case gets trickier than a cat in a bathtub since blockchain doesn’t belong to any country. Unlike permissioned networks, which have a governing body, Bitcoin resembles a mystery novel with an unknown author—good luck finding that law!
Breaking Down the Law
Lehmann’s remedy? Instead of one-size-fits-all legal solutions, he suggests applying various national laws as needed to straighten out blockchain records. Think of it as a multi-flavor ice cream shop where you can’t settle for just one flavor. He proposes utilizing a transfer obligation under the relevant national law to tackle irreversibility while sidestepping the need for a single governing law. Sounds like a good balance, right?
A Cautious Approach to Property Law
In Lehmann’s view, it’s advisable to steer clear of property law unless the blockchain defines a specific choice of law within its code. That way, we don’t turn the blockchain into an unwieldy mess of legal entanglements. This careful adjustment would only correct the ledger to the extent necessary, using the technology’s own forms—no legal overreach here!
The Future of Blockchain and Law
If you’re wondering whether we’ll find a magic wand to fix public blockchain networks for compliance with European data privacy laws, Professor Lehmann might say hold your horses. Challenges remain, and as we navigate this uncharted territory, it’s crucial to recognize that while blockchain is revolutionary, law can’t just chase after it blindly.
+ There are no comments
Add yours