B57

Pure Crypto. Nothing Else.

News

New York Judge Extends Telegram’s Gram Token Restraining Order: Insights from the Hearing

What’s the Ruckus About?

In the latest drama from the courtroom of Judge P. Kevin Castel, the excitement surrounding Telegram’s Gram tokens has taken another unexpected twist. Following an intense two-hour hearing, a restraining order that prevents Telegram from distributing its much-anticipated Gram tokens has been extended. Clearly, this courtroom is a hotbed of tech-related intrigue!

The SEC’s Standpoint: Are Grams Securities?

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) believes that the Gram token, initially branded as the utility token for the Telegram Open Network (TON), should be classified as a security. This classification is pivotal because it affects how investment vehicles are regulated and creates boundaries for entity operations. Based on this belief, the SEC took decisive action back in October, effectively putting the brakes on Telegram’s initial coin offering (ICO). That’s right; it’s not just digital money; it’s in the judicial crosshairs!

What Happened During the Hearing?

During the heated debate, Judge Castel held back judgment on the SEC’s request for a preliminary injunction. Instead, he extended the current restrictions that have been in place. Anyone else sensing some courtroom tension? Telegram’s lawyer, Alexander Drylewski, expressed appreciation for the judge’s vigilance, especially with a deadline looming large on the horizon.

The Importance of the April 30 Deadline

The clock is ticking—April 30 is the ultimatum for Telegram. If the TON does not launch by this date, investors are in for a minor panic. You see, a clause in the Gram purchase agreements allows ICO participants to claim refunds. So, if moolah isn’t rolled out by the deadline, customers might just find themselves at the refund window—cue nervous laughter!

What’s the Timeline, Anyway?

The original launch date was, well, let’s just say a bit ambitious—October 2019. But hey, who’s counting? And while Drylewski agreed to the extension of the injunction to keep the peace, the judge warned that any refusal to extend the terms could lead to a swift court ruling. Let’s just say, the stakes are high!

Telegram’s ICO: The Second-Largest Ever

Despite the legal cloud hanging over it, Telegram’s ICO has made history as the second-largest of all time, pulling in a whopping $1.7 billion in two sales since January 2018. Wow! But the SEC claims that Telegram’s lack of registration was a glaring violation of Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933. Talk about a wild ride through regulatory waters!

What Lies Ahead?

As we look towards what this means for the future of Telegram and its ambitious TON platform, one has to wonder: will investors see their dreams come true, or will they see the funds head straight back in their wallets? One thing’s for sure—this soap opera ain’t over yet!

LEAVE A RESPONSE

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *