Reviving Terra: Major Changes to the LUNA and UST Revival Plan

Estimated read time 3 min read

Community Feedback Shapes New Plans

After a rollercoaster of a couple of weeks, the Terra community can finally exhale, or at least take a deep breath. The team has rolled out major revisions to their proposed revival plan for their beloved (or once-beloved) tokens, Terra (LUNA) and TerraUSD (UST). A recent tweet by Terra lit up the conversation on social media, announcing three significant changes that aim to put the pieces back together.

Increased Genesis Liquidity: What it Means

First up, the genesis liquidity is getting a boost, going from 15% straight to 30%. According to Terra, this increase is their method of trying to “mitigate future inflationary pressures.” It’s like when you discover that adding a spoonful of sugar actually helps balance out a sour lemonade – a risky experiment but worth trying. This adjustment is key for pre-attack holders of Anchor UST (aUST), LUNA, and other involved parties looking for a bit of reprieve.

Keeping Small Token Holders Afloat

Notably, Terra is considering its small fries—wallets holding less than 10,000 LUNA will share the same liquidity benefits as their bigger counterparts. Picture a classroom where the teacher suddenly decides to grade on a curve. These holders might not have had a huge role before, but this time they won’t be left in the dust. Importantly, 70% of their holdings will be vested over a two-year period, with a nice little cliff waiting at the six-month mark.

Reduced Allocation for Post-Attack UST Holders

The good news doesn’t roll on forever; the allocation for post-attack UST holders has seen a decline from 20% to 15%. Terra claims this change keeps the dpeg related allocation in line with what pre-attack ($LUNA) holders were originally promised. A move destined to evoke mixed feelings for those trying to make sense of their diminishing funds. A portion of the changed allocation (5%) will be moved to the community pool, serving as a reminder that in the world of crypto, there’s always more than meets the eye.

The Stablecoin Debate Rages On

The fallout from UST’s collapse has ignited discussions about the reliability of algorithmic stablecoins. University assistant professor Ryan Clements describes these coins as “inherently fragile,” based on a bedrock of assumptions that aren’t always, well, rock solid. But hold your horses! Defenders of the crypto realm, like Huobi Global’s co-founder Jun Du, argue that one bad apple doesn’t spoil the whole barrel. After all, even the best-sourced fruit can get bruised but will come back in season.

Looking Ahead: A Community United?

In the wake of these upheavals, it’s clear that both Terrestrial and digital economies are facing a crossroads. Will the changes glean trust back from holders? Will they be enough to reignite the flame of enthusiasm that once burned bright for the Terra community? Only time will tell, but as they say—every cloud has a silver lining. Or at least, we can hope so.

You May Also Like

More From Author

+ There are no comments

Add yours