Swaprum: The $3 Million Rug Pull You Didn’t See Coming

Estimated read time 3 min read

The Great Escape: What Happened at Swaprum?

In a dramatic twist in the crypto world, Swaprum, an Arbitrum-based decentralized exchange, has allegedly pulled the ultimate heist, making off with a whopping $3 million in user deposits. Imagine investing your hard-earned money into something that seems as stable as a bowl of jello during an earthquake. Just on May 19, it was reported that over 1,628 Ether (ETH), worth about $2.95 million, was swiped from their liquidity pools and promptly laundered through crypto mixing service Tornado Cash.

How the Rug Pull Went Down

For the uninitiated, a rug pull (or exit scam) is a not-so-fun magic trick where developers gather user deposits, wave their wands, and poof! – they disappear with your money. The opportunistic bad actors behind Swaprum meticulously planned their escape.

  • Gathered deposits like a kid collecting candy.
  • Deleted all social media accounts faster than you can say “where did my money go?”
  • Bridged the looted Ether to Ethereum like they were just transferring funds to grandma.
  • Laundered the funds through Tornado Cash, because anonymity is key when you’re trying to hide from the law.

Behind the Curtain: The Deplorable Backdoor

According to blockchain security firm Beosin, the rug pull was facilitated by a sneaky backdoor function known as

add()

that allowed Swaprum’s developers to steal liquidity provider (LP) tokens from users. It’s like a magician revealing how they made that rabbit vanish. The developers allegedly upgraded the smart contract with these shady functions after an audit was conducted.

What Role Did Auditors Play?

Token auditors are like the bouncers of the crypto party – they should be checking IDs to ensure everyone is who they say they are. Yet, despite passing an audit from CertiK just two weeks prior, the situation at Swaprum highlights a major flaw in the system. Users are now calling foul, demanding to know how CertiK missed these glaring red flags.

CertiK responded with a statement claiming they only assess the provided source code and can’t guarantee that developers implement their recommendations. Their disclaimer is as prominent as a neon sign that reads, “We don’t take responsibility.”

Aftermath: Lessons Learned

The debacle at Swaprum serves as a stark reminder in the crypto community. As exciting as the digital currency world may be, users must remain vigilant and conduct thorough research before investing. Not every project that glitters is gold, and that silly, cartoonish logo could well be on a thief’s getaway vehicle.

Key Takeaways:

  • Thoroughly vet platforms before investing.
  • Look out for red flags, like centralized control.
  • Always question those “audited” stamps – they might not mean what you think!

You May Also Like

More From Author

+ There are no comments

Add yours